AI Vulnerability Scanner — What to Look For in 2026
Buyer's Guide · 2026-02-07 · 12 min read · FilterPrompt Security Team
How AI vulnerability scanners work, the OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage checklist, and how to shortlist between FilterPrompt, Garak, Promptfoo and Lakera.
'AI vulnerability scanner' is a $15.58-CPC query with clear procurement intent. This guide walks through what a scanner does, what separates the good ones from the demoware, and how to shortlist for enterprise use.
What is an AI vulnerability scanner?
An AI vulnerability scanner runs a battery of adversarial probes against your LLM, agent, or GenAI application and reports which probes succeeded — i.e., which attacks the model failed to resist. A 'probe' is a crafted prompt (or multi-turn conversation) designed to trigger a known failure mode: prompt injection, jailbreak, PII disclosure, secret leakage, unauthorized tool use, and so on. A 'scan' is one execution of the probe battery against one endpoint. A 'finding' is a probe that produced an unsafe response.
How AI vulnerability scanners work
- Probe library — curated attacks (usually 500–5000) covering the OWASP LLM Top 10.
- Execution engine — parallel HTTP calls to your model with rate-limiting and retry.
- Evaluator — grades the response as pass/fail/error. Best-in-class use an LLM-as-judge with confidence scoring.
- Report generator — aggregates findings into a per-category score, per-probe evidence, and prioritized remediation.
The evaluator is where scanners diverge sharply. A cheap scanner uses substring-match ('if the response contains X, fail') and produces a flood of false positives. A serious scanner uses an LLM judge that reads both the attack and the response, considers whether the model refused vs complied, and grades with confidence. FilterPrompt uses the latter with a proprietary rubric plus a false-positive short-circuit for benign refusals.
OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage checklist
Shortlist rubric
- Coverage — all 10 OWASP LLM categories, updated when OWASP publishes a new version.
- Agentic probes — tests for function-calling injection and tool abuse, not just text-in/text-out.
- Evaluator accuracy — LLM-graded with confidence, not substring match.
- Evidence quality — PDF/HTML report per scan with full prompt/response chains and remediation.
- Integrations — works with OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Azure OpenAI, Bedrock, Ollama, vLLM, and any OpenAI-compatible endpoint.
- Pricing predictability — per-scan or per-1M-token pricing, not 'contact sales'.
The top 4 in the market
FilterPrompt — enterprise scanner + firewall in one platform, 1,000+ probes, LLM-graded evaluator, PDF reports, and free-tier access to the full OWASP LLM Top 10 sampler. NVIDIA Garak — open-source, strong academic pedigree, CLI-only output. Promptfoo — developer-first, best for evaluations that live in CI. Lakera — commercial firewall-first with scanner add-on, strong on prompt injection.
Cost of running a scanner vs cost of not running one
The 2026 average cost of a public LLM security incident (per IBM's report) is $215k, driven by remediation, disclosure, credit monitoring, and reputational damage. A scanner running on every deploy for a year costs a few hundred dollars in credits. The break-even is a single prevented incident every 400 years — which is why AI security scanners now show up in every serious AppSec budget.
